It’s not hard to see that Birdman is a fill in for batman. Michael Keaton is obviously making some plays out of his real life. Although I hope he found his career more satisfying than the character in “Birdman” did.
About ten minutes into this movie, the unique cinematography hit me. The entire movie is filmed in one long shot. Like, no joke. There are no cuts, no scene breaks, it’s all filmed on one camera. And although this is a mobile camera, it’s not shaky like the ones some movies use. You don’t need to worry about getting motion sickness like you might have in other handheld movies like “The Blair Witch Project”. And it’s not filmed like a documentary, the camera man isn’t in the movie, he’s just giving you a god-view of what’s going on. It’s almost like you, the audience, is a fly on the wall, following various people around.
This makes the movie feel like a Broadway show. If someone screws up in the last scene, you have to start filming the whole movie again from the start. Other actors have to get in position and change wardrobe while someone else is on scene. Now, they may have found a few ways to cheat and perhaps the movie isn’t all one long shot. But it sure looked to me like it was, and you can bet most of it was.
It’s very creative, since the movie is about a prior movie star trying to put together a Broadway show. And the result is hilarious, several scenes will leave you in stitches. There are a few factors that will leave you scratching your head as well, the plot turns out to be very deep, if you are willing to pay attention and look for it.
Overall, I’d say go see it. It did feel more like a Redbox rental though, than a movie theater movie. I’d suspect this movie will be up for a few Golden Globe nominations. So it is worth seeing.
I’m always down for anything with zombies in it. But that doesn’t mean I don’t judge them just as harshly as anything else. This is a comedic zombie movie that provides everything it promises. It was odd that the cast was full of well-known comedians, but the main actor was new, at least he was to me.
This movie doesn’t fail to perform. If you liked previous zombie comedies, like “Sean of the Dead”, then you will enjoy this movie as well. It has the same vibe throughout, as well as an independent film feel, like “Little Miss Sunshine”.
The big players in the movie aren’t the guts and gore. It’s the backstory about the characters and how relatable they are. The humor is in the dialogue, there are several quotable lines that will leave you in stitches.
So yes, if comedies and zombies are something you enjoy, then definitely check out this movie. It’s a direct to DVD, so look for it on Redbox.
This movie delivers exactly what it promises. The film has a graphic novel feel, not nearly as drastic as the “Sin City” movies. But there is a layer of grayscale darkening of the scenes and the subtitles are displayed in a manner you’d expect to see in a graphic novel. Stressed words are bolded and colored, it’s a nice touch and adds some originality.
The plot is kept simple, which I like in an action movie. When there are too many layers of conspiracies, it gets annoying trying to keep track of it all. This is a straight-cut Russian Mafia deal. John Wick is wronged and he seeks out those who wronged him.
Yes, the realism isn’t there. But right from the start the rules of this world are made clear and it abides by them. Which is good enough for me. I don’t need a movie to be believable, I just need it to stay true to itself.
There was never a moment when I was bored. There is plenty of action. Even if it’s absurd at moments. It’s still entertaining. The dialogue is half original, half cliques, a good enough mix for the style of movie it is.
The acting, never faltered. Everyone did a great job of engulfing me in this world.
So if you are looking for a great action movie, this is the one to see. Car chases, gun fights, hand-to-hand combat, this movie really has it all. And aside from some cussing, and death of course, I’d say it’s kid friendly too. I’d take an eight-year-old with me, they’d love it.
All I have heard it praise for this movie. So I decided to give it a try. The first hour I was reminded of M Night Shyamalan’s movie, “signs”. We are on a rural farm and strange events are occurring.
Then things get a little too convenient. Ex astronaut, now farmer, stumbles across a secret NASA program and all the scientists go, “hey while you are here, why don’t you fly our shuttle for us?” Seriously?
Then the physics lesson starts. They really tried to keep it grounded in real theories, but then they started pulling stuff out of who knows where and messing with time. You have to be really careful if you are going to do time travel. I’ve seen very few movies do it correctly. Did this movie pull it off?
Picture this, you are getting a physics lesson from a professor, he really knows his stuff and is giving all the details. But you… are super high on acid. That’s what this movie is, the interpretation of someone who is high on acid trying to understand physics.
So no. In my opinion they did not. Remember how I said things fell apart when I saw “Lucy”. This movie’s last half hour fell apart in much the same way.
If the movie would have tried less to be “real”, I would have bought more of the outrageous things they did. But as it is, the mesh didn’t work.
Spoiler, but if you want an example of what I mean: a guy gets sucked into a black hole and ends up in the fifth dimension, which happens to be behind his daughter’s bookshelf in her bedroom. Yeah… exactly.
This movie is the perfect mesh of fantasy and character. It takes place in a fictional city that is some hybrid of Tokyo and San Francisco. Technology is highly advanced. But that is not the focus. We quickly bond to our main character and his brother.
The secondary characters are all stereotypes, but that’s to be expected in a cartoon. They are still entertaining and have their moments of originality.
The plot has an emotional kick to it, on several levels. And there are numerous plot twists, some are easy to figure out, others will surprise you.
Is this as amazing as “frozen” or “the incredibles”. No, but it’s in the same realm. I did notice some bored kids, so gauge accordingly. I think the adults were enjoying it more. I’d mark it as a must see. And yes, it’s worth it to see in the theaters. There are quite a few action scenes that are nice on the big screen and would be enjoyable in 3-D, although I did not see that version.
I was expecting to see a lighthearted comedy. This movie did have a few good laughs. But the overall story had a very dark-depressing theme. I’m not saying it wasn’t good. But it wasn’t the lighthearted comedy I was expecting.
My only complaint is Bill Murray’s acting. He should have been the star, but he kind of flopped the scenes where he was supposed to be all serious. First, I hated the New York accent they made him speak with. You could tell it was fake. He sounded like someone who was talking like that because he wanted to make fun of New Yorkers. For some reason every time his accent got thicker, it would roughly jar me from the movie.
Then he has a stroke. And I get that he’s supposed to have trouble speaking afterwards. And they were trying to make light of it. But he came off as faking it. Like, for a while I wondered if he was really having problems or just milking it. In the end, yes, he really did have problems. But the way he performed the role, it didn’t come off that way… because you could tell he was… get this, ACTING.
Everyone else in the movie performed superbly, even minor characters were amazingly fleshed out. I would recommend it. And although darker than what I expected, the plot will pull at your heartstrings. If I had to compare it to another movie, it would be a lighter version of Clint Eastwood’s Gran Torino.
Once again the books started a little “off”. I’m finding this is a common trend with this author. She struggles to get the story started. In a rather abrupt manner, the main character’s brother is deathly injured and they decide to turn him into a vampire. To me, this event could have been done in a better way. But whatever, the result of having him turn, instead of Alice (the main character) did create for an entertaining tale.
I would rate this book as better than the first. The tension between picking between the two men is constant. It’s the ultimate book for readers who enjoy a good love triangle.
Now the ending, well, it rather tied up everything nicely. I was almost disappointed. Because it means there won’t be much love triangle in the next book. Or if there is, it won’t be the same. It did seem rushed and more explanation would have been nice, but otherwise I enjoyed it.
I can’t say more, because the spoilers would give away too much. But yes, I’d recommend the book.